Your coral records stay where they are.
Source colonies, genotypes, nursery material, outplants and monitoring remain in the organisation's own system of record. CoralQuery Science reads them and never changes them.
Governed answers for coral restoration science
CoralQuery Science gives restoration scientists one place to ask about genotypes, lineage, experiments, nurseries, outplants and monitoring—with the evidence behind every answer.
The problem
Genotyping results sit in lab files, nursery stock and outplants sit in operational databases, and experiments sit in notebooks and spreadsheets.
“Which genotypes survive well in the field but have never been heat-stress tested?”
Answering that question often means exporting, joining and cleaning data by hand—every time.
What it does
Source colonies, genotypes, nursery material, outplants and monitoring remain in the organisation's own system of record. CoralQuery Science reads them and never changes them.
Experiments, versioned protocols, tissue samples, genotyping batches and heat-stress trials carry independent sign-off, version history and an audit log. Genotype IDs are checked as they are entered.
Answers can combine lab and field context, showing which system each part came from, the query logic and the caveats that affect interpretation.
Built for scientific integrity
The system is designed to make limitations visible before a number is treated as a conclusion.
Coral records are read, never written. The lab notebook is the controlled place scientists write, with sign-off and version history.
Every answer shows its sources, query logic and caveats. Exported datasets retain their filters and sources.
When a scientific definition has more than one reasonable interpretation, CoralQuery Science asks rather than guesses.
Early deaths remain in survival figures, unmonitored corals are reported separately and small samples are flagged rather than ranked.
Correlations are labelled as descriptive, never presented as findings.
Scientists interpret and decide. Notebook entries require independent sign-off from someone other than the author or last editor.
Questions scientists can ask
CoralQuery Science is intended for questions that need evidence from more than one stage of restoration science.
What do we know about genotype RR-A017, and where is living material today?
Which genotypes have never been heat-stress tested?
Which genotypes have fewer than five living fragments across all nurseries?
Show one-year survival by genotype for the 2025 outplant cohort.
Which outplants bleached in the 2025 thermal event and later recovered?
Ten-minute product demonstration
The upcoming walkthrough follows a fictional genotyping batch from lab results to registered genotypes, traces one genotype from source colony to outplant with its heat-stress results, and shows plain-language questions answered with evidence.
Demonstration data only; no real organisation's records are shown. The narrated demonstration uses an AI version of Tom's voice.
Tandem product demonstration
CoralQuery is the operational companion to CoralQuery Science: a practical way for the people running restoration work and reporting on it to ask questions of their existing database in plain English.
AI Photo Label Station
A focused look at the supporting workflow for reviewing and labelling coral imagery.
How it works in practice
The working demonstration follows a genotyping batch, traces a genotype from source colony to outplant, and answers questions that join laboratory and field records.
Evidence-backed answers across controlled demonstration data.
The LLModelQuery engine, scientist-approved rules and evaluation against a restoration team's own data.
See it on your own questions
A working demonstration is available for teams evaluating CoralQuery Science. Contact us to arrange a secure demo login and walk through the system against the questions that matter to you.